* Translated by AI

Starnews

Suk-haeng, 'Affair Man's Wife' Releases Audio Recording: "I Even Tolerated a High-End Hostess... Please Look at Me with the Mind of Buddha" [Star Issue]

Published:

Han Haesun

*This content was translated by AI.

Singer Suk-haeng /Photo=StarNews
Singer Suk-haeng /Photo=StarNews

Trot singer Suk-haeng lost her first-trial lawsuit for damages related to allegations of an affair with married man Mr. B, while Mr. B's wife, Ms. A, released an audio recording stating that she had heard Suk-haeng say, "Could you just overlook this one time?"

On the 2nd, a video titled "[Exclusive] 'Please Save Me, Woman to Woman' It Finally Broke Over Suk-haeng's Return... Actual Call Recording Released by the Wife" was posted on the YouTube channel 'Respect Lee Jin-ho'.

According to the video, Ms. A, the wife of married man Mr. B, learned in March last year that Mr. B had been meeting with Suk-haeng and directly called Suk-haeng to request that she stop the meetings. However, as the meetings between Suk-haeng and Mr. B continued thereafter, Ms. A also contacted Suk-haeng via text message, stating, "Please do not see my husband anymore. I warn you as his wife." Despite this, Suk-haeng did not respond.

In the course of events, Mr. B told Ms. A that he had to accompany Suk-haeng to her performance on July 25, which was his birthday, and that he would not be able to spend time with their child on the 26th, which was the child's birthday. Ms. A claimed that Suk-haeng had continued an inappropriate relationship while being aware that the relationship between herself and Mr. B was a marital one. This contradicted Suk-haeng's claim that "she believed the marriage between Ms. A and Mr. B had already broken down."

/Photo=Screenshot from YouTube channel 'Respect Lee Jin-ho' video
/Photo=Screenshot from YouTube channel 'Respect Lee Jin-ho' video

In particular, an audio recording in the video drew attention, in which Suk-haeng said to Ms. A, "You even tolerated a high-end hostess, didn't you? Please just overlook me this one time. I will do well for you, really. We are the same age, so think of it as saving a friend... Please forgive me just once. It is truly unfair. I am also a victim, as one woman to another." The timing of Suk-haeng's late contact with Ms. A was after Ms. A had filed a lawsuit for damages against Suk-haeng over the alleged affair with Mr. B.

Additionally, Suk-haeng told Ms. A, "To be honest, I was going through a very difficult time alone because of my previous boyfriend, so I acted a bit rashly. I did not intend to do anything like that," and added, "If you could just look at me with a broad mind, just once with the mind of Buddha... I do not want to be cursed by anyone."

The Civil Division 7 of the Seongnam Branch of the Suwon District Court ruled on September 17 in the judgment announcement for the lawsuit filed by Ms. A against Suk-haeng seeking 100 million won in damages as a co-participant in an affair, ordering the payment of 30 million won and granting partial victory to the plaintiff.

The court stated, "Suk-haeng engaged in misconduct, such as dating and cohabiting with Ms. A's husband starting from January 2025, and therefore bears responsibility for compensating mental damages," and added, "There is no evidence to support the claim that the marital relationship between Ms. A and her husband was in a state of breakdown at the time of the misconduct, or that the husband deceived Suk-haeng with such intent. Suk-haeng's claims cannot be accepted."

<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>

*This content was translated by AI.

Recommended News

Editor’s Pick

Latest in Entertainment