Nana: Robbery with assault, denial of false accusation charges… admits to wine store theft [Comprehensive]

*This content was translated by AI.View Original

A man in his 30s who was sentenced to prison on appeal for the crime of breaking into the home of singer and actress Nana (real name Im Jin-ah) and committing a robbery denied the additional false accusation charges he was indicted on.

On the 10th, Judge Jo Young-min of the Criminal Division 2 Solo at the Seoul Central District Court held the first hearing for Mr. Kim, who was indicted on charges of false accusation and theft.

On this day, Mr. Kim's side stated, "We maintain that it is not a false accusation because we did not report false facts," denying the false accusation charge.

This reflects the position that Mr. Kim's complaint against Nana last December for attempted murder and aggravated assault was not a false report. Mr. Kim filed the complaint claiming that he himself had also been victimized by Nana at the time of the incident.

The police determined that Nana's actions constituted self-defense and made a decision not to refer the case, while Nana counter-sued Mr. Kim for the crime of false accusation. At the time, the Prosecution Service determined that Mr. Kim had filed a false complaint with the intent to have Nana criminally prosecuted, and indicted him on charges of false accusation.

Mr. Kim was also indicted on separate theft charges, which were merged with the false accusation case. While admitting to the charge of stealing goods worth 20 million won from a large mart in Seocho-gu, Seoul last November, he denied some of the charges, claiming that he did not steal wine among the stolen items.

Mr. Kim was prosecuted on charges of breaking into Nana's home in Achon-dong, Guri, Gyeonggi Province in the early hours of November 15 last year with a weapon, threatening Nana and her mother by strangling them, and demanding money, but failing to complete the act. Following the first instance, he was sentenced to seven years in prison at the appeal hearing held on the 22nd of last month, but filed an appeal against the appellate court's ruling.

<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>

*This content was translated by AI.View Original