*This content was translated by AI.
The players of the debate survival entertainment show "The Logic" faced off with the fiercely designed "Gangdaegang" logic, and "spinned" the viewers' time.
On KBS 2TV's "The Logic," which aired on the 29th, 100 players who entered "Logic City" entered the first round of "The Leader: Leader-in-Leader Debate" over "Immigration," the main theme of the full-fledged round.
Seo Exit, Lim Hyun-seo, and Joo Un-kyu, "survivor experienced" exploded "brainscape" with sharp logic and charisma, giving goosebumps not only to field players but also to viewers. In addition, it showed the higher quality and enthusiasm of the discussion than the warm-up round, which was a "high-dimensional dopamine feast," immersing viewers intensely.
The 100 players were divided into 10 groups of 10 people and entered the round in earnest. The main theme of the discussion was 'immigration', and the first round was 'The Leader: Leader-to-Leader Debate'. The rule of this round was that if the leader of each group chose either for or against the upcoming debate topic, the group, which won the highest score from 1st to 3rd in the subsequent debate, would receive coins as benefits. Soon after, Seo Exit appealed, saying, "I can take less coins," and became the leader of Group 1.
Security expert Chae Sung-joon in Group 2, Choi Young-jae in Group 3, economic YouTuber Joo Un-gyu in Group 4, teacher Cho Jae-beom in Group 6, lawyer Shin In-gyu in Group 7, Russian naturalized professors Ilya in Group 8, and lawyer Noh Seon-deok in Group 9. On the other hand, Article 10 was engulfed in "infighting" even before selecting a leader, and Lim Hyun-seo became the leader through voting with three people applying for the leader.
When the leaders of each group were decided, the first round of the thesis was announced. It was a debate for and against the need to designate areas where foreigners live densely as special security areas. Concerns were expected that the choice of "yes" would encourage discrimination, and most teams wanted to stand on the "opposite" side. After the logic overhaul, 100 players entered an overwhelming studio reminiscent of the British Parliament.
In the first match, Group 5 teacher Cho Jae-beom and Group 4 economic YouTuber Joo Eon-kyu faced off. While Joo Eon-gyu also fascinated the "pro-choice camp" with the logic that "a special security zone is a waste of administrative power in the era of online crime," Cho Jae-beom, who made the logic that "a special security area is a place where foreigners and foreigners can protect each other," made some emotional remarks after being pushed back by Joo Eon-gyu's early offensive. As a result, Ju Eon-gyu won with a vote of 2:3 against.
Next, naturalized professor Ilya and group 6 lawyer Shin In-kyu faced off. Ilya, who stressed that she is also an immigrant, said, "Am I a potential criminal?He shook the board from the start with a fierce question. He then launched a wave of attacks, saying, "Security is a broader concept than crime, and it is possible to revitalize the region by designating a special zone." Shin In-gyu countered that "special security areas are hatred and stigma against foreigners," and Ilya voiced his opinion, saying, "We need a policy that considers the specificity of areas where foreigners live." At this time, Ilya emphasized the "specificity of policy" according to the region, including Gyeongsang-do and Jeolla-do, and Shin In-kyu responded by saying, "How is the crime different between Jeolla-do and Gyeongsang-do?" and players booed, "Red card!" and "This is not right." After a fiery 'Gangdaegang debate', Ilya won with 3: Opposition 2.
Subsequently, Group 10 Lim Hyun-seo vs. 8 Noh Seon-deok and the "lawyer vs. lawyer" match were made. Noh Seon-deok argued, "It is not effective to reduce crime rates to designate areas where foreigners are concentrated as special security areas," and Lim Hyun-seo responded, "Foreigners often do not receive relief from crime due to language problems," adding, "We need a mid- to long-term policy that can harmonize foreigners and immigrants." Players who were persuaded by Lim Hyun-seo's calm tone praised him, saying, "He is also specialized in survival!" and Lim Hyun-seo, driving the momentum, said, "We need to institutionalize it as a law," citing "foreign safety zone," a concept similar to "special security zone." As a result of the discussion between the two, which was sharp right before the end, Lim Hyun-seo won with "Pros 4: Opposition 1."
The confrontation between "Group 1 Seo Exit VS Group 3 Choi Young-jae" is "the designation of a special security area is a populist policy that incites hatred," and "No." In response to the logic that "the purpose is to protect and settle foreigners," Seo Exit won a landslide 4:1. Finally, the match between "security expert" Chae Sung-joon of Group 2 and "Buckley Drum Genius" Gun-il of Group 7 began. Gun-il also resigned as the leader before the debate, and he said, "I'm sorry for our team members, but I don't think it's my place to join." However, he participated in the debate with warm support from his team members and showed a 180-degree change. When Chae Sung-joon said, "The special security zone needs to be introduced for future generations," Geon-il took issue with the "impact" of the "special security zone," citing his case of living in the United States for 10 years.
Despite Gun-il's sharp counterattack, the jury ruled in favor of Chae Sung-joon with 4: 1 against. With such a high-quality debate concluded, the pro-choice camp took the lead with a "yes 3: no 2" overall. In the trailer, which was released shortly afterwards, the second round of the "Freedom Fandang Debate" was declared, raising expectations for the leaders' debate battle, which will become even hotter.
<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>
*This content was translated by AI.
