* Translated by AI

Starnews

'Cohabitation Blind Date' Woman Accused of Being the Other Woman Speaks Out: "Stop Distorted Issue-Mongering" [Star Issue]

Updated:

Yoon Sanggeun

*This content was translated by AI.

/Photo=SBS 'Cohabitation Blind Date Project'
/Photo=SBS 'Cohabitation Blind Date Project'

'Cohabitation Blind Date' participant Woman A, identified as the other woman, has directly addressed the allegations surrounding her.

'On the 23rd, through a lengthy post, A stated, "Recently, false information has spread, and relentless attacks beyond reason against me and my mother continue. Despite not agreeing to an interview with the Suga program (Case Manager) recently or disclosing my information, I was reported with distorted and exaggerated content." She added, "I have hired a law firm, and my legal team is currently reviewing the legal validity of this matter. I did not wish to take legal action, as I believed this was being said without knowledge of the accurate facts."

'She continued, "The unreasonable criticism continues, and the mental harm inflicted on me and my mother is worsening. If voluntary deletion does not occur, we plan to take active legal action. We will respond carefully to prevent the continuation of indiscriminate distorted issue-mongering. I am deeply regretful that I was Suga without my consent. Once again, I extend my deepest gratitude to those who have supported me despite the repeated expansion and reproduction of distorted facts."

'Regarding the infidelity allegations, A did not provide specific explanations but emphasized in the comments, "The currently known information differs somewhat from the facts I am aware of. I have content to clarify, so please wait."

'Earlier, in the JTBC program "Case Manager" broadcast on the 20th, a tip was reported that the other woman is appearing on the currently airing "Love Variety Program" (Love Variety Program). The program in question is known to be SBS's "Cohabitation Blind Date."

'The tipster, a 40-year-old woman B, stated, "After receiving a divorce petition from my husband, I learned that he was having an affair." She added, "Someone told me they saw a man holding hands with a woman at night and putting his arm around her. It was a store employee."

'B pursued a counter-divorce lawsuit and a lawsuit against the other woman. The court ruled in favor of B, stating, "The husband was at fault." According to the verdict, "The defendants developed a romantic relationship around 2017 and, from that time onward, engaged in an improper relationship, including traveling abroad together several times. It is judged that the primary responsibility for the breakdown of the marital relationship lies with the defendant (the other woman) and the husband who committed the infidelity."

'The court ruled that the husband must pay 30 million won in damages to his wife, and the other woman must jointly pay 20 million won of the 30th million won to the husband. However, B stated she has not yet received the damages.

'B said on the broadcast, "I thought I had divorced and moved on, forgetting everything, but it seems trauma remained. It was painful to be separated from my children due to circumstances during the divorce, yet it is unjust that the person who destroyed the family appears on the 'Love Variety Program' without any concern, hiding the past and seeking a new partner. I thought the husband and the other woman were still meeting."

'According to "Case Manager," the production team contacted the "Cohabitation Blind Date" participant identified as the other woman. A stated, "This has nothing to do with me, and I have never received a verdict. If baseless claims are made, we will take legal action."

'In response, lawyer Yang Ji-yeol expressed doubt, saying, "If a verdict has been issued, how can she claim it has nothing to do with her? Does this mean she hasn't received the verdict, or that she was completely unaware of this fact? It is hard to understand."

'Meanwhile, the "Cohabitation Blind Date" production team stated, "We became aware that one of the participants has a past history that could cause social controversy. We requested confirmation of the facts from the participant, but we have not yet received a specific response."

'They added, "Upon becoming aware of the controversy, we immediately began urgent re-editing. To ensure viewers can watch the broadcast without discomfort, we have decided to completely remove the participant's segments from all remaining episodes."

<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>

*This content was translated by AI.

Recommended News

Daily Trending News

Editor’s Pick

Latest in Entertainment