Lee Jang-woo's side said, "The payment for the delivery of the Sunduk House has already been paid..I'm sorry for the misunderstanding." [Professional]

*This content was translated by AI.

Actor Lee Jang-woo explained the controversy over "the receipt of the Sunduk House" and said, "I have already paid the payment."

Actor Lee Jang-woo is participating in the operation as a shareholder of Hoseok Village, but the full amount of the delivery has already been paid to Mujin Co., Ltd., the client under the contract, said the agency Hunus Entertainment on the 17th.

"Since then, Mujin has been unable to pay to Company A, causing problems," he said. "There is no direct contractual relationship between Company A and Ho Seokchon or actor Lee Jang-woo."

Hunus Entertainment said, "What was reported as if actor Lee Jang-woo did not pay is not true, and the claim that Mujin is the owner of Hoseokchon, which was mentioned in some reports, is also not true. Mujin has never held a stake in Hoseokchon and has nothing to do with actor Lee Jang-woo, he said. "I feel moral responsibility for not fully examining whether the intermediary is implemented in this transaction structure."

In addition, regarding the claim that the supplier tried to contact him through SNS, he said, "More than dozens of messages are received on actor Lee Jang-woo's account a day, and messages from unfollowed accounts are classified as 'message requests', making it difficult to immediately check them," adding, "The failure to check the message in a timely manner is not a fact, but it was not intentionally avoided or ignored."

Hello, we're Hunus Entertainment.

I would like to tell you about the recently reported controversy over the "Hoseokchon Unpaid Money" related to actor Lee Jang-woo.

Actor Lee Jang-woo is participating in the management of Hoseokchon with shareholders. Hoseokchon has already paid the full amount of the delivery to Mujin Co., Ltd., which is a contractual customer, and since then, the problem has arisen as Mujin has failed to pay to Company A.

In other words, there is no direct contractual relationship between Company A and actor Ho Seok-chon or actor Lee Jang-woo, and it is not true that actor Lee Jang-woo did not pay. In addition, the fact that "Mujin was the owner of Hoseokchon" mentioned in some reports is also not true, and Mujin has never held a stake in Hoseokchon. Actor Lee Jang-woo has nothing to do with Mujin.

However, in this transaction structure, we feel moral responsibility for not fully examining whether intermediaries are implemented.

In addition, regarding the fact that the supplier tried to contact him through SNS, actor Lee Jang-woo's account receives more than dozens of messages a day, and messages from unfollowed accounts are classified as separate "message requests," making it difficult to immediately check them. As a result, it is true that the message has not been checked in a timely manner, but we have not deliberately avoided or ignored it.

For your information, I am attaching the details of Hoseokchon's payment to Mujin as verifiable data.

We apologize for the misunderstanding caused by content that is different from the truth, and we will provide necessary cooperation to resolve the issue smoothly.

Thank you.

<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>

*This content was translated by AI.