'Nana Robbery and Assault' Perpetrator, Instead of Repentance, Swears by "Ancestors" [Star Issue]

*This content was translated by AI.

A 30-year-old man identified as A, who broke into the home of actress Nana (35, real name Im Jin-ah), formerly of the group After School, and committed robbery, showed no signs of remorse despite the Prosecution Service's request for a 10-year prison sentence.

On the afternoon of the 17th, an appeal trial regarding charges including robbery and assault against A was held before the 14th Criminal Division (Presiding Judge Jeong Kyung-geun, Judges Lee Hyung-geun and Lee Hyun-woo) of Seoul High Court in Seocho-gu.

On this day, the Prosecution Service requested the court to overturn the original verdict and sentence A to 10 years in prison, stating, "Considering that defendant A has multiple prior criminal records, the original sentence is too lenient. We urge the court to revoke it and impose a 10-year prison term on the defendant." The prosecution further noted, "The defendant's claims are entirely unconvincing. Although the robbery was attempted and injuries were clearly inflicted on the victim during the process, instead of showing remorse, he filed criminal charges and continues to make false statements. It is undeniable that he is continuing to inflict secondary harm on the victim by exploiting her status as a famous celebrity."

However, A's legal representative stated, "The defendant deeply regrets having entered the victim's residence and causing mental distress and shock. Although he did not carry a knife, he acknowledges that this incident was entirely his fault and sincerely apologizes to the victim. However, he consistently denies possessing a dagger or entering with one. He claims it was a simple theft based on a mistaken belief that the house was empty. In fact, the victim's testimony contains some contradictions. We request that the court overturn the charge of entering with a weapon. The robbery was only attempted, and the sentence is too severe. There was no premeditated plan to enter; it was an accidental intrusion into an empty house. Although injuries occurred when he encountered the victim, the crime itself remained an attempt. He deeply regrets and repents for his actions, so we earnestly request a more lenient sentence than the original verdict."

In his final statement, A said, "I am worried that my words may be contradictory. Nevertheless, I will speak in this last argument with the hope of clinging to even a rotten rope. I am sorry to both victims. All responsibility lies with me. If I had not held such wrong thoughts and taken such actions from the beginning, this would never have happened. Regardless of the reason, I am truly sorry," bowing his head.

However, A immediately added, "But one cannot claim to have done something that was not done. I absolutely did not bring a knife. It is unreasonable for someone living in a rental home worth 25 million won to purchase an expensive knife sold only at department stores." He repeatedly reiterated this claim, which the Prosecution Service had labeled as false.

A also said, "I was additionally charged with false accusation. I have reached a point where I must bear everything simply because I am considered a criminal. I cried a lot. It is an unbearable weight to carry," appealing through tears.

He continued, "I entered that house (Nana's residence) under the mistaken belief that no one would be there. I never intended to harm anyone or cause any injury. I swear by my deceased ancestors. Please understand." After mentioning each judge's name individually, he added, "As a defendant who committed a crime, I am well aware that asking for leniency is selfish, but with sincere heart, I beg the presiding judge for mercy. Please show leniency so that I may return to my mother and live a changed life. Once again, I earnestly request a favorable disposition for the defendant and ask for another chance. I am sorry. Thank you," wiping away tears.

The court is scheduled to deliver its verdict on October 22 regarding A.

A was previously indicted for breaking into Nana's home in Achon-dong, Guri City, at around 5:38 a.m. last November 15 with a weapon, threatening the mother and daughter with it, and demanding money. He was subdued by Nana and her mother, resulting in an attempted robbery charge.

As a result of this incident, Nana and her mother B sustained injuries requiring 33 days and 31 days of treatment, respectively. A also filed criminal charges against Nana for attempted murder and special assault, claiming he was stabbed in the neck while being subdued. Subsequently, Nana's self-defense was recognized, leading to a decision not to prosecute. The false accusation case filed by Nana's side was forwarded to the Prosecution Service with an opinion to indict.

The first-instance court determined that A entered the residence with a weapon and sentenced him to seven years in prison. However, regarding the charge of robbery and assault against Nana's mother, it was reclassified as aggravated robbery and convicted.

The first-instance court determined that Kim entered the residence with a weapon and sentenced him to seven years in prison. However, regarding the charge of robbery and assault against Nana's mother, it was reclassified as aggravated robbery and convicted.

<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>

*This content was translated by AI.