"Would Sookhaeng 'I Didn't Know' work?"Confident apology, unfavorable situation [★FOCUS]

*This content was translated by AI.

Singer Sook-haeng, who was embroiled in the "Suspicion of Lady Sanggan," posted an apology to the effect of unfairness, saying he would reveal the truth through legal proceedings. However, the eyes of the legal profession are cold. Given the circumstances and evidence that have been disclosed, it is not easy to avoid responsibility in mutual lawsuits.

Suspicions related to gambling were raised through JTBC's "Case Team Leader," which aired on November 29. In the broadcast, a report from a housewife in her 40s was released saying, "My husband and a famous trot singer had an affair."

A claimed that her husband left home with a famous trot singer while having two adolescent children. In addition, a CCTV video showing A's husband and Sookhaeng hugging or kissing in the elevator was also released. Mr. A said that he had filed a mutual lawsuit against Sook-haeng.

Originally, the real name was not mentioned on the broadcast, but soon after the broadcast, Sookhaeng was pointed out online as Sanggannyeo. Then, on the 30th of last month, he posted a handwritten apology on his SNS. Sookhaeng said, "We sincerely apologize for causing concern over the recent personal incident."

Sookhaeng is in a position to reveal the facts through legal procedures, without providing any explanation for the allegations between the two sides. He said, "Also, all facts will be revealed through legal proceedings later. I respectfully ask you to refrain from excessive and unnecessary reporting, as the act of indiscriminately spreading unconfirmed facts can cause difficult damage to me, my family, and the programs I participated in."

Earlier, Sookhaeng appealed for unfairness through the 'case leader'. "I started dating believing that the other's marriage had already broken down," he said. "I was relieved that I had already agreed to divorce my wife and that I had finished dividing my property and arranging alimony." After recognizing that the man's words were not true, he said, "I organized the relationship."

However, some of his explanations raised doubts. He said, "I sincerely believed in the other person, introducing my parents as a person who will promise the future and explaining that I will get married as soon as the legal process is completed." However, it can be interpreted that the fact that the legal process has not yet been completed may have been somewhat aware that the marriage relationship between Mr. and Mrs. A was maintained. For this reason, some are questioning whether the meeting continued even after being aware of the situation.

Although the facts cannot be determined at present, the legal profession is expected to be unfavorable to the court.

Lawyer Park Ji-hoon said on JTBC's 'Case Team Leader', "The CCTV video seems relatively clear. It doesn't seem easy to beat in a commercial lawsuit, he said. "We need a sufficient explanation of the scene, but I wonder if it's possible." "The amount itself may not be large due to the alimony claim lawsuit, but it is unclear whether the right to indemnify the man will be exercised in the event of a penalty problem caused by the suspension of broadcasting activities," he said. "It seems unfavorable because there is a possibility that some of his responsibilities will be recognized."

Lawyer Park Sung-bae, who appeared on MBN's "News Fighter," also explained, "It may have been deceived in the beginning, but there is room for interpretation as a circumstance that we met knowingly from a certain point," adding, "It is difficult to deny illegal activities if we met while recognizing that the marriage is maintained through my wife's protest." He added, "It does not seem easy to escape from legal responsibility under the circumstances revealed so far, and we have to wait and see if additional data will come out to reverse it."

In addition, regarding CCTV or transcript evidence, "There is also a system for applying for preservation of evidence in civil lawsuits, so if there is a fear that the evidence will be lost, it can be secured in advance. There is no clear Supreme Court precedent that should exclude illegally collected evidence in principle.

Lawyer Heo Ju-yeon, who appeared on Channel A News, pointed out, "The court does not accept it easily because there are often claims that 'I didn't know' in the mutual lawsuits," adding, "We need objective evidence to prove that Sook-haeng was really deceived."

Meanwhile, Sukhaeng, who made his name by reaching the top 6 on TV Chosun's "Miss Trot," took on a new challenge by appearing on the MBN audition program "Hyunjae King 3" for the first time in six years. However, he has temporarily suspended his activities, saying, "I will drop out of the program I was appearing in so that it will not damage the program anymore."

<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>

*This content was translated by AI.