'Home Insecurity Victim' Nana, Nervous About Testifying: "I Took Cheongsimhwan" [Star Scene]

*This content was translated by AI.

Nana, a singer and actress formerly of the group After School, visited the court for witness testimony.

On the 21st, the First Criminal Division (Presiding Judge Kim Guk-sik) of the Namyangju Branch of the Uijeongbu District Court held the third trial of Defendant A, who was prosecuted for robbery and assault. In the trial, Nana, who was the victim of the robbery, and her mother appeared as witnesses.

Thirty minutes before the trial, Nana appeared at the court in simple attire. With a makeup-free face, she smiled after lowering her mask.

Before the witness testimony, Nana told reporters, "I was so nervous that I took Cheongsimhwan. I am trying to control my emotions." She added, "I plan to tell the truth transparently, exactly as it happened."

She also shared her thoughts on Defendant A, who denies the charges. Nana said, "It feels like a very ironic situation that I have come to this place. If we just speak honestly and transparently, I think a proper verdict will be reached. I will be back soon."

Previously, Defendant A was accused of breaking into Nana's residence in Achon-dong, Guri City, Gyeonggi Province, on the morning of November 15 of last year, and threatening Nana and her mother with a weapon to steal money. At the time, Nana and her mother struggled with Defendant A, subdued him, and reported the incident to the police. In the process, both Nana and her mother were injured.

Defendant A filed a complaint against Nana for attempted murder and aggravated assault, claiming he was injured while being subdued by Nana and her mother. The police determined that Nana's actions constituted self-defense and decided not to prosecute due to lack of grounds. Subsequently, Nana filed a complaint against Defendant A with the police for false accusation.

At the first trial, Defendant A admitted to breaking into Nana's home but claimed he had no intent to commit robbery. Additionally, Defendant A argued that he was unaware the house belonged to Nana and initially claimed he did not enter the premises while carrying a weapon.

<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>

*This content was translated by AI.