"Is this fun?" Nana, witness takes the stand, expresses anger toward the defendant [Star Scene]

*This content was translated by AI.

Nana (real name Im Jin-ah), a singer and actress formerly of the girl group After School, whose home was invaded, expressed anger upon meeting the defendant.

On the 21st, the First Criminal Division (Presiding Judge Kim Guk-sik) of the Namyangju Branch of the Uijeongbu District Court held the third trial of Defendant A, who was prosecuted and detained on charges of aggravated robbery.

During today's trial, Nana, the victim of the robbery, appeared as a witness.

As soon as Nana entered the courtroom, she turned to Defendant A and said, "Is this fun?" expressing her anger. She then told A, "You commit robberies and roam around freely. Is this fun? Look me in the eyes. Is this fun?" Defendant A did not avert his gaze but looked directly at Nana.

Sitting in the witness stand, Nana told the judge, "It seems like an ironic situation," revealing her bewildered state of mind.

The judge, addressing the agitated Nana, said, "Witness, please observe courtroom etiquette, as this is a court of law," and added, "Everyone gathered here is prepared to listen carefully to the circumstances of the incident."

However, Nana continued to glare at Defendant A without calming her emotions. The judge then stated, "Continuously staring at the defendant will cause agitation and prevent the witness examination from proceeding smoothly," to which Nana replied, "It is a situation where agitation is unavoidable."

Previously, on the morning of November 15 last year, Defendant A entered Nana's residence in Achon-dong, Guri City, Gyeonggi Province, and is accused of threatening Nana and her mother with a weapon and attempting to steal money. At the time, Nana and her mother engaged in a physical struggle with A, subdued him, and reported the incident to the police. In the process, both Nana and her mother were injured.

Defendant A filed a complaint against Nana for attempted murder and aggravated assault, claiming he was injured while being subdued by Nana and her mother. The police determined that Nana's actions constituted lawful self-defense and decided not to prosecute due to lack of grounds. Subsequently, Nana filed a complaint against Defendant A with the police for false accusation.

During the first trial, Defendant A admitted to entering Nana's home but claimed he had no intent to commit robbery. Additionally, Defendant A asserted that he was unaware the house belonged to Nana and initially claimed he did not enter the premises while carrying a weapon.

<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>

*This content was translated by AI.