"What kind of outrage is this?" MC Mong, indiscriminate doxxing of real names → One-week account suspension [Star Issue]

*This content was translated by AI.

Singer MC Mong's account was suspended after he conducted a live broadcast revealing the real names of various celebrities, including actor Kim Min-jong.

On the 18th, MC Mong posted a notice on his TikTok account stating, "Account suspended for one week due to '○○' expression."

On that day, MC Mong claimed regarding past controversies over draft evasion, "I did not have my wisdom teeth extracted. Despite being acquitted in the first trial, second trial, and even the Supreme Court, MBC imposed the image of 'Tooth Extraction Mong' on me."

He also stated that the MBC current affairs program 'PD Notebook' is re-investigating matters related to him, saying, "I was asked for my stance on embezzlement of company funds and advances, but I was never involved in accounting at all."

MC Mong also exposed conflicts regarding One Hundred Label and BPM Entertainment, which he co-founded. He claimed he clashed with Chairman Cha Ga-won over management methods and was subsequently excluded from company affairs. Regarding prostitution allegations, he asserted that A-ssi, the younger brother of Cha (Chairman), distorted photos of his girlfriend.

He then referred to A-ssi as "a person obsessed with gambling," stating that a so-called 'Baduk-i' gambling circle involving billions of won in stakes exists, which sparked controversy when he mentioned the real names of actor Kim Min-jong and former So Sok-sa (CEO) singer Kim Ho-joong.

He also mentioned the group The Boyz. MC Mong expressed anger, saying, "I gave 16.5 billion won as an advance payment for The Boyz. If The Boyz received 1.5 billion won each, totaling 16.5 billion won, they should return 8 billion won and leave. But aren't they refusing to even return that? What kind of outrage is this?"

Previously, nine members of The Boyz, excluding New, filed a petition to suspend the effectiveness of their exclusive contract against One Hundred Label on February 10. They claimed that One Hundred Label failed to pay settlement funds after the second quarter of 2025 settlement and unreasonably refused requests to review materials, demanding contract termination. Consequently, Seoul Central District Court granted the petition to suspend the effectiveness of the exclusive contract.

<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>

*This content was translated by AI.