[Exclusive]'Seven-year prison sentence' Nana's home intruder to face court again in August

*This content was translated by AI.

A man, identified as A, who broke into the home of singer and actress Nana, formerly of the girl group After School, will appear in court again this August.

The 14th Criminal Division (Judge Na) of the Seoul High Court will hold the first appeal trial session for A's robbery and injury charges on August 13.

The 1st Criminal Division (Judge Da) of the Uijeongbu District Court, Namyangju Branch, held a sentencing hearing for A's robbery and injury charges and sentenced him to seven years in prison. In an earlier closing argument session, the Prosecution Service had requested a 10-year prison term for A, stating that "the severity of the crime is serious, he has shown no remorse, and no settlement was reached with the victims."

On this day, the court stated, "We recognize the robbery and injury against Nana's mother as guilty. However, regarding the incident involving Nana, it appears more appropriate to classify it as attempted robbery resulting in death rather than simple robbery and injury." The court added, "We determined that the defendant was carrying a knife at the time. Based on the specific and consistent testimonies of the victims, and considering that the defendant himself admitted in an online post made secretly for legal advice before handing over his phone to the police immediately after the crime that he possessed the knife with the intent to use it for dangerous purposes, we concluded this based on all such circumstances."

The court further noted, "Even if it is acknowledged that the defendant engaged in a physical struggle to suppress the victims' resistance and set the knife aside, during which Nana stabbed the defendant's neck area with the knife, such injuries do not necessarily constitute criminal harm. The victim was acting in self-defense against the defendant."

The court stated, "The defendant entered the home at night, when absolute peace should be maintained, while armed with a weapon, committing robbery and injury as well as attempted robbery resulting in death. Considering the gravity and seriousness of the crime, punishment commensurate with the offense is unavoidable." The court added, "The victims suffered physical and mental pain and expressed their desire for punishment against the defendant, who has a history of multiple criminal convictions. However, we took into account that the crime was attempted, injuries occurred during the process, there is no indication the defendant intended to use the knife as a means of killing, and considered the nature and circumstances of the injuries sustained by the victims."

Following this, both A and the Prosecution Service filed appeals. The Prosecution Service stated regarding the appeal, "Although the court found all charges against the defendant guilty, it classified the offense against Nana not as robbery and injury but as attempted robbery resulting in injury. We appealed on grounds of factual error, misinterpretation of law, and inappropriate sentencing."

A was arrested and indicted for breaking into Nana's residence at 11:00 a.m. on November 15, 2025, in Achon-dong, Guri-si, Gyeonggi-do, threatening Nana and her mother with a weapon and attempting to steal money.

During the incident, Nana and her mother subdued A through a physical struggle and handed him over to the police. Subsequently, A filed countercharges against Nana for attempted murder and other offenses, claiming he was injured while being subdued by Nana and her mother. However, the police determined Nana's actions constituted self-defense and decided not to prosecute. Nana also filed charges against A for false accusation.

During his interrogation, A stated, "There was no knife during the home intrusion. I was surprised when I encountered Nana's mother. She was startled and told me to leave; I only came to steal things after she calmed down, but then she pushed me." He continued, "Nana's mother threatened my neck with a knife and stabbed me. I tried to calm her by hugging her and did not strangle her." He added, "After being stabbed with the knife, I bled heavily. I was hit multiple times by Nana's mother. I held the blade with both hands; if I let go, I would have died. I then resisted with my right hand. I even heard the sound of skin tearing. Eventually, the confrontation ended. I committed no assault. If hugging constitutes assault, I admit it."

A explained, "I answered all questions about why I did this and my name and age. My mother suffered a brain hemorrhage and is in the hospital. Since I had borrowed 10 million won in fines from her following a previous trial, I ended up stealing items." He further stated, "Nana told me she would call the police if I brought a knife. We talked for about 30 minutes, and then they immediately reported it to the police."

A said, "I admit my mistake, but there was no knife, nor did I strangle or assault anyone. I have deeply reflected on this. I am sorry." He also added, "At the time of intrusion, I did not know the victim was Nana; I only found out during police investigation."

Nana and her mother appeared as witnesses at the third trial session regarding A's robbery and injury charges on April 21. At that time, upon seeing A in court, Nana immediately expressed anger by saying, "Is this fun?" She then told A, "You commit robberies like this and roam around freely; is it fun? Look me straight in the eyes. Is it fun?" A did not avert his gaze but stared back at her.

In the subsequent testimony, Nana described the situation during the incident: "After experiencing this event, I thought I was fine. However, unconsciously, it has remained as trauma in my life. I came here praying for the case to be resolved quickly," expressing her struggle with trauma.

After the trial, Nana shared on a fan communication platform, "Seeing him face-to-face left me speechless and angry, causing me to lose emotional control. However, I was able to say everything I wanted to say clearly." She continued, "I also told that man what I wanted to say, and I have no regrets about my actions or words. Everyone must have been very worried, but I am fine. I believe this will now be concluded."

Nana subsequently stated, "I hope [the person] pays the price for all the vicious criminal acts committed so far," and posted the phrase "reaping what one sows" (). Nana posted an article asking "Who is the victim?" She then pointed out, "Multiple trials by the criminal. Six public trials, one trial of final appeal today, for a total of seven trials. Consistent false statements and retractions. There is no remorse from the criminal."

She further emphasized, "During this process, the Prosecution Service requested a 10-year sentence. The court sentenced him to three years and seven years in prison. Even for special robbery and injury, the minimum is seven years or more. There is no remorse. There is no forgiveness."

<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>

*This content was translated by AI.