*This content was translated by AI.

Comedian Park Na-rae's side revealed the internal situation, which has not been known so far, saying, "It is a legal dispute right now," regarding the controversy over the non-handling of the former managers' resignation. Regardless of Park Na-rae's intention, the registration of the director was carried out, and there was a problem with the appointment process itself.
As a result of the Star News report, A and B remain in-house directors of N Park on the corporate register, despite the fact that they are currently in a severe conflict with Park Na-rae and his agency, N Park.
In response, Park Na-rae told Star News on the 1st, "The registration of the in-house director was made without Park Na-rae's consent and is currently under legal judgment," adding, "We have never allowed managers (A, B) to register as in-house directors in the first place." He then claimed, "The managers who took over the documents related to the CEO registered them without any reports." Currently, the CEO of Anpark is listed as Park Na-rae's mother, Ko.
In the process of preparing to register for the pop culture and arts planning business, Park Na-rae delivered related documents such as power of attorney, corporate seal, and seal to all managers, but they said they used the documents to register their own internal directors. Park Na-rae believes that there were false reports and forgery of private documents in the process, and stressed that the case will also be revealed through the investigation.
On the other hand, Jeon's manager is making conflicting claims. "[Park Na-rae] said, 'It's too dangerous to be caught because only you and your mother's names are on the current register, so you have to register me and the team leader as an in-house director,'" A said. "He refuted, 'Go to the legal counselor with the necessary documents and move to the registered director.' The arguments of both sides are sharply divided over the process of registration of an in-house director.
Park Na-rae also stressed that since A and B remain registered in the corporate company as internal directors, dismissal is also an issue that must go through legal procedures. Park Na-rae explained, "The dismissal of the internal director is not a matter that Park Na-rae can handle arbitrarily," adding, "We need to hold a general shareholders' meeting and obtain the consent of shareholders." "At first glance, it may seem like Park Na-rae is intentionally neglecting the company, but that is not true," he added. "If all managers submit their resignations, the fastest procedural arrangement is possible."

Earlier, A and B took office as in-house directors at Anpark on September 26 last year, and were listed on the corporate registration on October 13 of the same year. On the same day, Park Na-rae's mother, identified only by her surname Goh, also took office as CEO and completed the registration. However, A and B left Anpark in November last year, claiming harassment and damage to power abuse at work, and have continued civil and criminal legal disputes with Park Na-rae since then.
In-house directors are executives, not workers, so resignation only means the end of the labor contract relationship and does not immediately lead to the resignation or extinction of director status. It has not been confirmed whether A and B have formally submitted their resignations. However, considering the fact that he left the company, there may be room for the resignation itself to be interpreted as an expression of his intention to resign. In addition, the company must proceed with the registration of changes reflected in the corporate register. For this reason, if the registration change process is not carried out even if the company leaves the company, the status of "current director" will be maintained by registration.
Mr. A recently told Star News, "It is difficult to understand why he still remains a director even though he has already left the company," adding, "Since it is a corporation, the cancellation of registration must be done by Park Na-rae, and there is nothing we can do. There is no profit at all just because you are listed as a director, and there is no stake," he said.
Meanwhile, Park Na-rae and former managers have been fighting over various suspicions such as power abuse and embezzlement since the end of last year. During their tenure, A and B filed a lawsuit against Park Na-rae for damages worth 100 million won, claiming damages such as workplace harassment, special injuries, proxy prescriptions, and non-payment of progress fees.
In response, Park Na-rae responded to the charges of attempted blackmail and embezzlement on the basis of false claims, saying the former managers demanded a large amount of money. It is also at the center of controversy over allegations of illegal medical practices through 'auntie injections'.
Park Na-rae completed the investigation twice as a complainant at Yongsan Police Station, and A reportedly left for Las Vegas in the United States after being investigated as a defendant. Mr. A said, "It's for health reasons," and that he is planning to return home this month.
<© STARNEWS. All rights reserved. No reproduction or redistribution allowed.>
*This content was translated by AI.
